As a technical gathering, REPSA 2027 serves as a platform for presenting and deliberating on the latest theoretical advancements and technological innovations in AI-driven learning technologies. We sincerely invite authors worldwide to submit their original research works to the conference. All the accepted papers will be included in the conference proceedings, and will be sent to EI Compendex and Scopus for indexing.
Topics include but to limited to:
IMPORTANT DATES
Paper Submission Deadline: November 30, 2026
Acceptance Notification: December 31, 2026
Revision Submission and Registration: January 31, 2027
Main Event: March 12-14, 2027
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
-Authors must make sure that their submissions do not substantially overlap work which has been published elsewhere or simultaneously submitted to a journal or another conference with proceedings.
-All submitted papers should be within the FOI of this conference.
-The submission file is in Microsoft Word, PDF, or WordPerfect document file format.
-All URL addresses in the text (e.g., http://pkk.suu.ca) are activated and ready to click.
-All submitted papers should be written in English.
-All submitted papers shall be sent to the conference email address: repsa@acamail.org.
-All submitted papers must be prepared based on the given Paper Template.
REVIEW POLICY
The review process at REPSA 2027 is double-blind. Each submission is anonymously reviewed by an average of two independent reviewers, to ensure the final high standard and quality of each accepted submission. The technical program committee will perform a shrinking process for the submitted paper about the scope and tracks of the conferences prior to the review process. REPSA 2027 guarantees that the entire peer review and publication process is meticulous and objective. Furthermore, all works not in accordance with these standards will be removed from publication if malpractice is revealed at any time even after the publication.
REVIEW CRITERIA
Reviewers evaluate the submitted paper based on the following criteria:
(1) Is the subject matter within the scope of the conference?
(2) Does the paper contain enough original results to warrant publication?
(3) Is the paper technically sound and free of errors?
(4) Is the work clearly and concisely presented? Is it well organized?
(5) Does the title clearly and sufficiently reflect its contents?
(6) Is the abstract informative? Are the main results and conclusions mentioned?
(7) Are the illustrations of adequate quality, relevant and understandable?
(8) Does the bibliography give a clear view of the current state-of-the-art in the domain?
(9) Is the quality of the language satisfactory?
ACCEPTANCE OF THE MANUSCRIPT
Reviewers will send the suggestions/comments to the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.